Hydrophobicity/Hydrophilicity of 1-Butyl-2,3-dimethyl and 1-Ethyl-3-methylimodazolium Ions: Toward Characterization of Room Temperature Ionic Liquids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We continue to experimentally characterize the constituent ions of room temperature ionic liquids in terms of their interactions with H(2)O. By using the so-called 1-propanol probing methodology, we experimentally index the relative hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of a test ion. In this paper, we examine 1-butyl-2,3 dimethylimidazolium (abbreviated as [C(4)C(1)mim](+)) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C(2)mim](+)). We found that [C(4)C(1)mim](+) dissociates completely in dilute aqueous solution less than 0.006 mol fraction, and hence, its hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity could be determined. The results indicate that [C(4)C(1)mim](+) is highly amphiphilic with much stronger hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity than normal ions. Our earlier similar studies indicated the same conclusion for such typical constituent ions as 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C(4)mim](+)), PF(6)(-), CF(3)SO(3)(-), and N(SO(2)CF(3))(2)(-). Hence, we suggest that the constituent ions of room temperature ionic liquids that we have studied so far are all amphiphiles with much stronger hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity than normal ions. We found, furthermore, that the hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of [C(4)C(1)mim](+) are stronger than those for [C(4)mim](+). A possible reason for higher hydrpohilicity is discussed in terms of strong acidic character of H on the C(2) of the imidazolium ring, which tends to attract the delocalized positive charge toward itself on forming a hydrogen bond to H(2)O. On replacing it with CH(3) in [C(4)C(1)mim](+), the lack of acidic H enhances the positive charge in the vicinity of N-C-N in the ring that interacts with the surrounding H(2)O strongly to an induced dipole of O of the H(2)O. For [C(2)mim](+), we found it does not dissociate completely, even in dilute aqueous solution, and hence, we could not characterize it within the present methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".