MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022038123 · doi:10.2118/170147-ms

Waterflooding Experiments with X-ray CT Imaging

2014· article· en· W2022038123 on OpenAlexafffund
Mike London, Shauna Cameron, James Donald, Fred Wassmuth

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Innovates
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSynchrotronSaturation (graph theory)Oil productionMaterials scienceEnhanced oil recoveryProduced waterImage resolutionPetroleum engineeringScannerBrineDiffractionOpticsEnvironmental scienceGeologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three experiments have been performed, injecting brine and polymer into a sand pack saturated with heavy oil. Each experiment was imaged with time lapse X-ray CT. The first two experiments, conducted in a medical scanner with a resolution of 350 μm, suggested important features below the scale of spatial resolution. The last experiment, performed in a synchrotron beamline with a resolution of 4.3 μm, provided a view of oil/water interactions on the scale of individual pores. Conventional theory holds that waterflooding is unstable with respect to the development of fingers, which push the oil ahead of them. "Sweep efficiency" can be improved by increasing the water viscosity with polymer, which reduces the mobility ratio and stabilizes the front. Waterflooding has been applied successfully to heavy oil, but the detailed mechanisms of recovery are not well understood. Breakthrough of water occurs quickly at the producer; most oil production occurs at high water cuts over a long period of time. The most striking feature of the medical scans was the absence of distinct fingers of high water saturation. The only identifiable, compact "front" consisted of saturation changes of 20% or less. Moreover, breakthrough occurred long before the front reached the production end of the pack. More surprisingly, water saturation was observed to increase everywhere throughout each experiment. The inference was that fingering, if present, was occurring at a scale below that of the resolution. The synchrotron scans did not reveal the expected pore scale fingering, but instead showed evidence of water transport entirely in wetting films. Residual blobs of connate water were observed to grow throughout, but never linked up to form fully water-saturated paths. The mechanism of oil mobilization was also quite different from the traditional picture. There was no scale at which oil was pushed ahead of a water front. Instead, isolated droplets of immobile water swelled, fed by films of water on the grain surfaces. These results do not rule out an eventual transition to a more conventional picture; only a few pore volumes were injected. But the path to that state may be different from what is usually assumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-CanadaSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207