MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

ASTHMA AS A PREDICTOR OF INJURY IN YOUTH ICE HOCKEY AND SOCCER

2001· article· en· W2022061069 on OpenAlexaffabout
Merrilee Zetaruk, Hans Pasterkamp, David Zurakowski, Jessica Holbrow

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce hockeyAsthmaPsychologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineAeronauticsEngineeringInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this study was to compare the risk of injury between athletes with asthma (A) and those without (NA) in ice hockey and indoor soccer. The design was a prospective, case-control study of injuries over one season of play. 210 athletes (131 M, 79 F) 12 to 16 years of age who played community ice hockey or indoor soccer in Winnipeg, Canada in 2000 were recruited. 110 hockey players and 100 soccer players underwent spirometry, respiratory questionnaires, and physical examination to identify those with asthma (n = 40). Injuries were identified by a physiotherapist and referred to a sports medicine pediatrician for diagnosis. Variables examined included age, gender, weight, height, sport, hours/wk, total hours, years of experience, and presence or absence of asthma. Main outcome measures were the presence or absence of injury, defined as sport-related trauma resulting in time lost from training or games, and multiple injuries (>1/player). In the NA group, 89 of 170 (52%) sustained injury during the season compared to 13 of 40 players (33%) in the A group (p = 0.03). 57% percent of soccer players incurred injuries compared to 40% of hockey players. Multiple stepwise logistic regression confirmed asthma and sport as independent predictors of injury, with the NA group having a 2.5 fold increased risk compared to the A group(OR = 2.5, 95%CI = 1.4–4.5, p = 0.02). Soccer players were twice as likely to be injured as hockey players (OR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.3–6.7, p = 0.03). Soccer players were also more likely to sustain multiple injuries compared to hockey players (p = 0.006). Injury outcome was not associated with age, gender, height, weight, hours/wk, total hours, or years of experience playing the sport (p >0.1 for each). The injury rate was 12/1000 hrs in the NA group and 7/1000 hrs in the A group. These data suggest that young athletes with asthma who participate in ice hockey or indoor soccer are less likely to sustain injury than their peers without asthma. Supported by the Children's Hospital Foundation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicSports injuries and prevention→French-language works237,207→