MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022178561 · doi:10.2118/78823-pa

Application of Low-Dosage Hydrate Inhibitors in Deepwater Operations

2002· article· en· W2022178561 on OpenAlexaff
Beide Fu, S. Neff, Anil K. Mathur, Katherine A. Bakeev

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Facilities · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrateClathrate hydrateSoftware deploymentPetroleum engineeringBiochemical engineeringEnvironmental scienceFlow assuranceHigh pressureChemistryProcess engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Novel low-dosage hydrate inhibitors (LDHI) have been developed for applications in oil and gas fields. A new generation of kinetic inhibitors has been used to prevent hydrate formation frequently encountered in deepwater operations. These chemicals effectively inhibit hydrate formation, regardless of the water cut in the system. They also exhibit a low toxicity that leads to very favorable environmental ratings. Valuable experience has been learned from recent laboratory studies and field trials with respect to the application limits and implementation techniques for these new products. The key to the overall success is a full integration of a good front-end design, a comprehensive deployment plan, and an effective monitoring program. An overview of the chemistry of these new inhibitors is discussed briefly along with their performance under simulated deepwater conditions. In addition, the effect of LDHI on hydrate formation and the effect of pressure on LDHI performance are addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Production & FacilitiesSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207