Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Design of Selective, Membrane-Impermeant Inhibitors Targeting the Human Tumor-Associated Isozyme IX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of positively charged sulfonamides were obtained by reaction of aminobenzolamide [5-(4-aminobenzenesulfonylamino)-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide] with tri-/tetrasubstituted pyrilium salts possessing alkyl-, aryl- or combinations of alkyl and aryl groups at the pyridinium ring. The new compounds reported here were assayed for the inhibition of four physiologically relevant carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) isozymes: the cytosolic hCA I and II, the membrane-anchored bCA IV, and the membrane-bound, tumor-associated isozyme hCA IX. They showed potent inhibitory activity against all investigated isozymes, although with different profiles. For CA I the new derivatives showed inhibition constants in the range of 3-12 nM, for CA II in the range of 0.20-5.96 nM, against CA IV in the range of 2.0-10.3 nM, and against CA IX in the range of 3-45 nM, respectively. These new compounds are membrane-impermeant due to their salt-like character. Some of these derivatives were also tested for their inhibitory activity against the Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) anion exchanger AE1: two derivatives showed inhibitory activity in the low micromolar range, whereas one compound was inactive at these concentrations. The high affinity of these new derivatives for the tumor-associated isozyme CA IX and their membrane impermeability make this type of CA inhibitor interesting candidates for the selective inhibition of only the tumor-associated isozyme and not the cytosolic ones, for which they also show high potency. Furthermore, we prove here for the first time that the CA-AE metabolon can be inhibited by the same type of sulfonamide derivative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".