MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022205907 · doi:10.1021/ie051336q

Multivariate Image Analysis of Flames for Product Quality and Combustion Control in Rotary Kilns

2006· article· en· W2022205907 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Szatvanyi, Carl Duchesne, Gianni Bartolacci

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Technology and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionKilnProcess engineeringOverheating (electricity)Environmental scienceFlue gasRotary kilnAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceWaste managementChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotary kilns are widely used in industry to achieve effective gas−solid heat transfer at high temperatures by direct contact with hot flue gases obtained by combustion. However, various disturbances related to nonpremixed combustion often used in practice introduces undesired variability in product quality and forces overheating, especially when obtaining the desired quality is dependent upon reaching a minimal solids discharge temperature. This paper investigates the use of digital RGB flame images and multivariate image analysis (MIA) techniques to quantify these combustion-related variations and to predict the future behavior of product quality. Very good solids discharge temperature forecasts were obtained over a time window running from current time t to about the mean residence time within the kiln using only a single flame image collected at time t . This information will be used to develop innovative automatic flame image-based control schemes to improve quality control and reduce fuel consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicIndustrial Technology and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207