MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022222717 · doi:10.1353/crv.2007.0006

From General's Daughter to Coal Miner's Daughter: Spinning and Counter-Spinning Jessica Lynch

2006· article· en· W2022222717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bruce Tucker, Priscilla Walton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePoliticsEmpireGender studiesLawHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In March 2003, Iraqi soldiers captured Pfc. Jessica Lynch, and one week later, American soldiers rescued her in a dramatic, filmed operation. From the moment of her capture, both the American government and the media used Lynch's story as a template for narratives that went far beyond the life of an American soldier to engage questions about war, race, gender, and nation. Journalists debated such issues as women in the military and Lynch as a feminist icon and even revisited the Great Society programs of the 1960s to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of government intervention in Appalachia, Lynch's region of origin. The spinning and counter-spinning of Lynch's story moved the traditional captivity narrative into a new form of imperial myth making, obliterating hierarchies of race, gender, and class at home, while setting Lynch in a foreign land where she was threatened by male, Arabic soldiers. This narrative sought to contain political opposition to the war, resolve the systemic blocking of opportunity in Appalachia, and bring Iraq fully into the orbit of American Empire. Résumé En mars 2003, les soldats iraqiens ont capturé la simple soldate Jessica Lynch, et une semaine plus tard celle-ci était libérée par des soldats américains au cours d'une action commando filmée. À partir du moment où elle a été faite prisonnière, le gouvernement et les médias américains se sont servis de l'histoire de Lynch comme modèle narratif de récits qui allaient bien au-delà de la vie d'un soldat américain, et soulevaient de graves questions sur la guerre, sur la discrimination raciale et sexuelle, voire sur l'idée même de nation. Les journalistes discutèrent de questions telles que la présence des femmes dans les forces armées, le statut de Lynch comme symbole féministe, et passèrent même en revue les programmes gouvernementaux des années 1960 pour prouver l'inefficacité des interventions gouvernementales dans les Appalaches, région d'origine de la soldate Lynch. La manipulation dans un sens ou dans l'autre de cette histoire a fait passer le récit traditionnel de captivité à une nouvelle forme de mythe qui effaçait les différences raciales, sexuelles et sociales aux États-Unis pour situer Lynch dans un contexte étranger où elle se voyait menacée par des soldats arabes. Cette interprétation narrative visait à contenir l'opposition politique à la guerre, à résoudre les problèmes endémiques qui caractérisent les perspectives d'avenir dans la région des Appalaches et à ramener pleinement l'Iraq dans l'orbite de l'Empire américain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207