Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thomas Philippe, a French Dominican friar, and Jean Vanier, a Canadian philosopher and former naval officer, founded the first L'Arche community in France in 1964. L'Arche has now become an international federation of some 120 communities. In the 1960s and 1970s it was seen as a groundbreaking movement and as a leader in the development of non‐institutional and life‐affirming approaches to caring for those with learning disabilities. The term ‘mental handicap’ was more commonly used at the time that L'Arche was founded. The ethos of a caring community underpinned by spiritual and religious values has provided a much‐admired and emulated model. It has not been without its costs, however, and the communities, like others involved in caring, are having to address some fundamental issues concerning the impact on carers and the way in which the vision of the founders can be developed and sustained in the future. This personal account and reflection, by the sister of one of the founders, is built on her experience of L'Arche in the UK. It sets out some of the challenges facing the creation of a caring environment for both carers and cared for. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".