MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022396327 · doi:10.1139/f04-139

Seasonal changes in the lipids of <i>Mysis mixta</i> (Mysidacea) from the hyperbenthos of a cold-ocean environment (Conception Bay, Newfoundland)

2004· article· en· W2022396327 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nicole B. Richoux, Don Deibel, Raymond J. Thompson, Christopher C. Parrish

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMysidaceaBayZooplanktonBiologyPelagic zonePopulationTrophic levelEcologyCrustaceanZoologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total lipid (TL) and lipid class composition of Mysis mixta Lilljeborg from 240-m depth in a cold-water marine bay were studied throughout 1999 and 2000. The objective was to relate the seasonal lipid dynamics in an abundant and lipid-rich hyperbenthic species to its life cycle and to the annual phytoplankton bloom. Mysis mixta accumulated high levels of lipid reserves similar to those reached by other cold-water zooplankton. Greatest accumulation occurred in maturing females and males upon initiation of the spring bloom and continued for 6 months. The lowest TL level was ~5% dry mass (DM) in small juveniles, post-spawned males, and spent females, and the highest level was 32% DM in females approaching full maturity (overall content range 0.3–16 mg·mysid–1). Most females accumulated lipid for 2 years before spawning, although a few females spawned 7 months early with a very low TL content. Seasonal variation in TL resulted primarily from net changes in triacylglycerol, the predominant neutral lipid. Seasonal and interannual variation in TL quantities in individuals and in areal concentrations of lipid in the hyperbenthic population indicates a strong trophic link between M. mixta and the pelagic production cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207