MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022408706 · doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e3182a0ce6e

Childhood Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

2013· article· id· W2022408706 on OpenAlexaff
Andréane Lavallée, Dominique Bourret-Massicotte, Patricia A. Laughrea

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2013
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Saint-Sacrement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSymblepharonBiopsyDapsoneDermatologyDifferential diagnosisConjunctivaPemphigoidIndirect immunofluorescencePathologyAntibodyImmunologyBullous pemphigoid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To report a case of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) occurring in childhood with exclusively ocular involvement. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 12-year-old girl presented with mild bilateral conjunctival cicatrization, symblepharon, and peripheral inflammatory keratitis. No other mucosal or cutaneous involvement was present. The findings of an initial conjunctival biopsy with immunofluorescence study were negative for MMP. After a few recurrences of mild corneal and conjunctival inflammation, a second conjunctival biopsy was performed at a different site in the same eye, 30 months later. Only then was the diagnosis of MMP confirmed using positive direct immunofluorescence. The results of a systemic investigation for autoimmune vasculitis were negative. Therapy with dapsone was introduced, and a good response was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: MMP is an extremely rare condition in children. This case is the second one reported with exclusively ocular involvement. Despite its rarity in the pediatric age group, MMP should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic conjunctival inflammation and fibrosis. Furthermore, a single negative biopsy should not exclude this diagnosis in a suspected clinical case, even in children. When a high degree of suspicion is present, a repeat biopsy may prove useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorneaSame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207