GM-CSF and Dendritic Cells in Allergic Airway Inflammation: Basic Mechanisms and Prospects for Therapeutic Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction between dendritic cells (DC) and naïve T cells is the first step in the evolution of an immune response, either tolerogenic or inflammatory. Therefore, the status of DC residing at mucosal sites, such as the airway, has a definitive impact on the character of the ensuing immune response. In the absence of pathogenic stimulation, DC serve to regulate immunological homeostasis in the lung; the generation of Th2-associated (allergic) inflammatory responses, which are directed at presumably innocuous antigens, represent a deviation from normal DC function. The dysregulation of DC phenotype leading to the development of allergy might be programmed by genetic pedigree, or might be induced by factors released in the airway. One potential candidate, GM-CSF, is abundant in the allergic airway and can condition DC to propagate Th2 responses. Moreover, that allergens, alone or in combination with other factors, can spontaneously induce GM-CSF production in the airway thus present a compelling etiological argument for the role of GM-CSF in allergic sensitization. The interplay between DC and mediators present in the allergic airway is likely critical to the establishment of allergic airway inflammation. Understanding these interactions may, therefore, afford insight into prospective therapeutic interventions to circumvent, and even reverse the allergic diathesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".