Evolution of Synthetic Signaling Scaffolds by Recombination of Modular Protein Domains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Signaling scaffolds are proteins that interact via modular domains with multiple partners, regulating signaling networks in space and time and providing an ideal platform from which to alter signaling functions. However, to better exploit scaffolds for signaling engineering, it is necessary to understand the full extent of their modularity. We used a directed evolution approach to identify, from a large library of randomly shuffled protein interaction domains, variants capable of rescuing the signaling defect of a yeast strain in which Ste5, the scaffold in the mating pathway, had been deleted. After a single round of selection, we identified multiple synthetic scaffold variants with diverse domain architectures, able to mediate mating pathway activation in a pheromone-dependent manner. The facility with which this signaling network accommodates changes in scaffold architecture suggests that the mating signaling complex does not possess a single, precisely defined geometry into which the scaffold has to fit. These relaxed geometric constraints may facilitate the evolution of signaling networks, as well as their engineering for applications in synthetic biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it