Relative humidity control for atomic force microscopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the design and performance of a relative humidity (RH) control chamber for use with atomic force microscopes (AFM) in which the tip is scanned across the stationary sample. The small volume (∼9cm3) chamber encloses the sample, the cantilever holder, and a commercial humidity/temperature sensor. The RH is controlled by passing a controlled ratio of dry and humid nitrogen gas across the sample. This unique design prevents exposure of the scanner assembly to humid gas and maintains all of the functionalities of the AFM system with no measurable degradation of its performance. Using this system, the RH at the sample position can be varied between 5% and 95% and controlled to within ±0.2% during an AFM measurement. To demonstrate the performance of the RH control chamber in imaging and force spectroscopy modes, we have characterized the RH-dependent swelling of small chitosan droplets with diameters of 3–40μm, and the RH dependence of capillary forces between the AFM tip and a mica surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".