The chromosomes of<i>Rhynchosciara baschanti</i>(Diptera: Sciaridae): Molecular cytogenetic comparisons with taxa in the<i>americana</i>-like group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polytene chromosome analysis is presented for Rhynchosciara baschanti, a species belonging to the americana-like group of Rhynchosciara. R. baschanti chromosomes show morphological differences in centromeric and telomeric regions compared to two other members within the group, R. americana and R. hollaenderi. In addition, fixed band and autosomal inversion differences were noted. Physical mapping data showed synteny among the taxa under study for DNA puffs and single-copy or histone gene probes, whereas rDNA and poly-(r)A probes showed different diagnostic patterns. The activity of developmentally active genes and the pattern of thymidine incorporation into DNA puff sites of R. baschanti are consistent with those found in the two previously studied species, except for lower levels of expression at some of these sites. These results suggest that differential duplication of specific DNA sequences, in particular repetitive and homopolymeric DNA, has played a role in the chromosomal evolution of these Rhynchosciara species. Inversions and band dimorphisms have also occurred, but the processes leading to their maintenance and fixation appear to have been slow, since these three species are in general chromosomally monomorphic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".