MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022484855 · doi:10.1139/g00-041

The chromosomes of<i>Rhynchosciara baschanti</i>(Diptera: Sciaridae): Molecular cytogenetic comparisons with taxa in the<i>americana</i>-like group

2000· article· en· W2022484855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ann Jacob Stocker, Eduardo Gorab

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsBiologyPolytene chromosomeGeneticsGene duplicationSyntenyDNAHeterochromatinGeneChromosomeMolecular biologyChromosomal inversionKaryotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polytene chromosome analysis is presented for Rhynchosciara baschanti, a species belonging to the americana-like group of Rhynchosciara. R. baschanti chromosomes show morphological differences in centromeric and telomeric regions compared to two other members within the group, R. americana and R. hollaenderi. In addition, fixed band and autosomal inversion differences were noted. Physical mapping data showed synteny among the taxa under study for DNA puffs and single-copy or histone gene probes, whereas rDNA and poly-(r)A probes showed different diagnostic patterns. The activity of developmentally active genes and the pattern of thymidine incorporation into DNA puff sites of R. baschanti are consistent with those found in the two previously studied species, except for lower levels of expression at some of these sites. These results suggest that differential duplication of specific DNA sequences, in particular repetitive and homopolymeric DNA, has played a role in the chromosomal evolution of these Rhynchosciara species. Inversions and band dimorphisms have also occurred, but the processes leading to their maintenance and fixation appear to have been slow, since these three species are in general chromosomally monomorphic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207