The national liver transplantation audit: an overview of patients presenting for liver transplantation from 1994 to 1998
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe current clinical practice in liver transplantation in the UK and Ireland, to provide overall 1-year graft and patient survival rates, and to study some preoperative risk factors. METHODS: All patients receiving a liver transplant in the UK or Ireland between 1 March 1994 and 30 September 1998 were included. Data were collected on patients at the time of transplantation, 3 months after grafting and annually thereafter until the patient's death. The main outcome measures were graft and patient survival at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 3102 liver transplants were carried out, of which 87 per cent were first transplants. The mean age at first transplantation was 42 (range 0-76) years. The most common indications for transplantation were primary biliary cirrhosis, alcoholic cirrhosis and posthepatitis C cirrhosis, but variations existed between sexes and centres. Risk factors associated with lower graft and patient survival were the presence of acute disease, being transplanted from hospital, and the need for renal and/or ventilatory support before operation. CONCLUSION: Donor and recipient demographics are consistent with data held by the European Liver Transplant Registry, as are 1-year graft and patient survival rates. Variation across centres in factors such as the primary indication for liver transplantation, population demographics, the clinical status of each patient, incidence of retransplantation and other risk factors contributes to the problem of adjusting for case mix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".