Characteristics of patients diagnosed with AIDS shortly after first detection of HIV antibodies in Lyon University hospitals from 1985 to 2001<sup>*</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A diagnosis of AIDS shortly after the detection of HIV antibodies suggests a long-lasting course of the disease without care. The factors associated with a short delay between the initial HIV-1-positive test and the first AIDS-defining event were identified in 1901 patients from 1985 to 2001 in Lyon University hospitals. A total of 576 individuals (30.3%) had an interval of </=3 months between the detection of HIV infection and AIDS. The factors independently associated with a delay of </=3 months were: age from 30 to 44 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-3.2]; age from 45 to 59 years (OR 5.6; 95% CI 3.9-7.8); age >/=60 years (OR 4.5; 95% CI 2.5-8.1), compared to those<30 years old; heterosexuality (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6-3.4); injection drug use (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-2.7); and other exposures (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6-3.4), compared to homosexual exposure; two opportunistic infections at AIDS (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4-2.4) compared to one; and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia as initial AIDS event (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.8-3.7), compared to Kaposi's sarcoma. These results provide opportunities to refocus local public health interventions to reduce delayed access to care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".