The Metrics of Clinical Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
suppurative superinfection.Our approach to management was two-fold: In addition to a 5-day course of oral clindamycin (600 mg twice daily), the fistula was rinsed twice a day with 5 mL of a Eucalyptus-based oil mixture (KielMix-PT 70; Klonemax, Central Tilba, Australia).After 3 days, the patient's malodour had completely resolved.The patient was discharged home after 14 days.Oil therapy was continued postdischarge, and administered daily by his wife, a former nurse.After 2 and a half weeks, clinical signs of superinfection in terms of inflammation and purulence were markedly reduced.The fistula appeared clean, and there was evidence of healing by secondary intention: a layer of fibrin had formed, deep in the fistula.After 6 weeks of the essential oil regimen and no further antibiotics, the fistula had completely closed.This is not the usual course of events for ulcers associated with cancers of the head and neck.The oil therapy did not retard the growth of the tumor, and by the eighth week it had grown along the path of the former fistula to the skin surface.Despite this, the offensive smell that had prompted his presentation to the emergency department did not recur.His quality of life had been improved by the use of the essential oils, and he was able to live at home with his family for the next 10 weeks until he died.We have now treated more than 30 patients with a similar regimen of topical essential oils.Adverse effects are uncommon and are usually limited to minor irritation at the time of application.The beneficial effects, however, have been quite pronounced.We are in the process of planning a randomized controlled trial to confirm our observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.058 | 0.228 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".