High incidence of absent nerve conduction in older patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome has been reported by some to have a less satisfactory outcome in older patients following surgery. However, this impression is not supported by other investigators but no objective explanation has been suggested for these differences. In our department, such patients are routinely treated with night wrist splints and, if this is unsatisfactory, they are investigated with nerve conduction studies prior to surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This paper reports the neurophysiological outcome in a young (< 40 years of age) and an older (> 60 years of age) group of patients with clinical bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome who did not benefit from splints. RESULTS: The results showed that both the motor and sensory conduction speeds are significantly lower in the older age group. More importantly in the older group, half had one or more hands where the sensory conduction was absent. In four out of these 10 patients this finding was bilateral and three patients had unilateral absent motor conduction. In the younger group, no patient had absent conduction. CONCLUSIONS: Poor surgical outcome in some older patients may be because of irreversibly damaged nerves prior to surgery and pre-operative neurophysiology is, therefore, recommended both for clinical and medicolegal reasons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".