MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022601193 · doi:10.1002/jcb.1302

Isolation of transcriptionally active chromatin from human breast cancer cells using Sulfolink coupling gel chromatography

2002· article· en· W2022601193 on OpenAlexafffund
Jianmin Sun, Hou Yu Chen, James Davie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNucleosomeAcetylationEstrogen receptorHistoneChromatinMolecular biologyBiologyChemistryCell biologyBiochemistryDNAGeneGeneticsCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of transcription unfolds the nucleosome. The unfolded nucleosome structure will be maintained as long as the histones are in a highly acetylated state. Typically the cysteine residue at position 110 of histone H3 is buried in the interior of the nucleosome. However, the transcribed unfolded nucleosome has its H3 cysteine exposed, offering a tag to isolate and study transcribed nucleosomes. In this study, we applied Sulfolink Coupling Gel chromatography to isolate unfolded nucleosomes from estrogen dependent human cancer T5 cells. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity did not enhance the yield of unfolded nucleosomes from these cells. We show that the estrogen receptor and c-myc transcribed DNA sequences are associated with unfolded nucleosomes. In chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIPs) assays, we found that the coding regions of the estrogen receptor and c-myc genes are bound to highly acetylated H3 and H4 in cultured T5 Cells. We conclude that in cultured T5 breast cancer cells H3 and H4 are in highly acetylated states maintaining the unfolded structure of the transcribed nucleosome and facilitating subsequent rounds of elongation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207