The influence of decompressive craniectomy for major stroke on early cerebral perfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Multiple trials have shown improved survival and functional outcome in patients treated with decompressive craniectomy (DC) for brain swelling following major stroke. It has been assumed that decompression induces an improvement in cerebral perfusion. This observational study directly measured cerebral perfusion before and after decompression. METHODS: Sixteen patients were prospectively examined with perfusion CT within 6 hours prior to surgery and 12 hours after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative perfusion measurements were compared and correlated. RESULTS: Following DC there was a significant increase in cerebral blood flow in all measured territories and additionally an increase in cerebral blood volume in the penumbra (p = 0.03). These changes spread as far as the contralateral hemisphere. No significant changes in mean transit time or Tmax (time-to-peak residue function) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The presurgical perfusion abnormalities likely reflected local pressure-induced hypoperfusion with impaired autoregulation. The improvement in perfusion after decompression implied an increase in perfusion pressure, likely linked to partial restoration of autoregulation. The increase in perfusion that was observed might partially be responsible for improved clinical outcome following decompressive surgery for major stroke. The predictive value of perfusion CT on outcome needs to be evaluated in larger trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".