MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022685753 · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014

A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders

2014· article· en· W2022685753 on OpenAlexaff
James Bonta, Julie Blais, Holly A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueAggression and Violent Behavior · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityWilfrid Laurier UniversityPublic Safety Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecidivismPsychopathyPsychologyAntisocial personality disorderPredictive validityPerspective (graphical)PersonalityClinical psychologyPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsInjury preventionMeta-analysisSuicide preventionRisk assessmentPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyMedical emergencyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.133
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.133
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.063
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations339
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAggression and Violent BehaviorSame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207