MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022698551 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab64

64 X-LINKED GENE EXPRESSION IN BOVINE ( <i>BOS TAURUS</i> ) MALE AND FEMALE <i>IN VITRO</i> - FERTILIZED AND SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER-DERIVED BLASTOCYSTS

2005· article· en· W2022698551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M.I. Nino-Soto, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco, Patrick Blondin, W.A. King

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatic cell nuclear transferTheriogenologyAndrologyBiologyBlastocystEmbryo cultureReproductive technologyGene expressionMolecular biologySomatic cellEmbryoTransgenesisCryopreservationGeneticsGeneEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expression of some X-chromosome linked genes has recently been shown to be altered in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) derived embryos (Wrenzycki et al. 2002 Biol. Reprod. 66, 127), implying that the regulatory mechanisms of X-linked transcription are affected by embryo in vitro production (IVP) methods. We analyzed the transcriptional pattern of X-linked genes ( BIRC4 , GAB3 , HPRT1 , MECP2 , RPS4X , SLC25A6 , and XIST ) in bovine in vitro fertilized (IVF) and SCNT male and female blastocysts to determine X-inactivation status and changes resulting from IVP. We collected pools of male ( n = 5 pools) and female ( n = 3 pools) IVF-derived blastocysts (Bousquet et al. 1999 Theriogenology 51, 59) and male ( n = 5 pools) and female ( n = 3 pools) SCNT-derived blastocysts (Mastromonaco et al. 2004 Reprod. Domest. Anim. 39, 462). Each pool consisted of five blastocysts. Embryos were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) + 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), collected, and stored at -80°C. Total RNA was extracted with an Absolutely RNA Microprep kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), DNase I treated, and precipitated with isopropanol and linear acrylamide (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) as a carrier. Reverse transcription was performed with Oligo-dT (Invitrogen, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) and Superscript II RT (Invitrogen). Transcript quantification was performed by quantitative real-time PCR using SYBR Green I (LightCycler system, Roche, Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada). Data analysis was performed with SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, SC, USA) using a mixed-model factorial ANOVA and with results presented as estimates of the median, ratios of estimates, and 95% confidence intervals with ± = 0.05. IVF-derived male and female blastocysts possessed similar levels of the transcripts analyzed, suggesting successful dosage compensation at this developmental stage for embryos fertilized in vitro . XIST was not detected in male IVF embryos. GAB3 was not detected in any of the female groups and, in addition, HPRT1 transcripts were not detected in SCNT derived female embryos. Male and female SCNT-derived blastocysts possessed marked differences in their transcript levels, with males showing statistically significantly higher levels of BIRC4 and RPS4X and females possessing higher levels of MECP2 and SLC25A6 transcripts although differences between the latter two were not statistically significant. XIST was detected in both male and female SCNT blastocysts. We conclude that dosage compensation between male and female IVF blastocysts is achieved at this developmental stage for the transcripts examined. However, this pattern was markedly changed in the SCNT group, affecting especially female SCNT blastocysts, suggesting that the regulatory mechanisms of X-inactivation and X-linked gene expression are substantially altered in SCNT embryos probably due to aberrant epigenetic patterns and faulty genome reprogramming. We are currently analyzing X-linked transcription in male and female in vivo -derived blastocysts in order to compare this group with IVP-derived embryos. This work was funded by NSERC, CIHR, and CRC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207