MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022699022 · doi:10.1002/cyto.b.21023

Practical guidelines for the high‐sensitivity detection and monitoring of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones by flow cytometry

2012· article· en· W2022699022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaFlow cytometryImmunologyMedicineHemoglobinuriaStopped flowHemolysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a life-threatening disorder caused by an inability to make glyco-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) anchors. While flow cytometry is the method of choice to detect the loss of GPI-linked proteins, the development and validation of sensitive, standardized, methodologies have been hampered by the rarity of this disease and by technical difficulties in the accurate identification of PNH cells. METHODS: Guidelines for the diagnosis and monitoring of PNH by flow cytometry were recently published by the International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS). However, specific reagent cocktails, and associated detailed analytic strategies were not directly addressed therein. In this supporting document based on the ICCS guidelines, we provide concise practical protocols for the high-sensitivity detection of PNH RBCs and WBCs (both granulocytes and monocytes). RESULTS: The CD235aFITC/CD59PE assay described was capable of detecting as few as 20 Type III PNH RBCs per million cells. Frequencies of Type III PNH cells in 10 normal samples were in the 0-6 per million RBCs. The high-resolution granulocyte/neutrophil assays described in this study could detect PNH phenotypes consistently at a level of 0.01% sensitivity. Frequencies of PNH phenotypes in normal individuals were in the 0-10 per million granulocytes/neutrophils range. CONCLUSIONS: The careful screening and selection of specific antibody conjugates has allowed the development of reagent cocktails suitable for high-sensitivity flow cytometric detection of PNH RBCs and PNH WBCs. The reagent cocktails described herein can be used on a variety of clinical flow cytometers equipped with four or more photo multiplier tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it