MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2022709664 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.tcme10-b28

Abstract B28: Epigenetic contribution of Wnt antagonists SFRP1 and DKK1 as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer

2010· article· en· W2022709664 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bharati Bapat, James B. Rawson, Miralem Mrkonjic, Roger C. Green, Steve Gallinger, Banfield Younghusband, John McLaughlin, Julia A. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerDKK1MethylationWnt signaling pathwayMicrosatellite instabilityEpigeneticsDNA methylationOncologyPopulationBiologyCancerInternal medicineCancer researchMedicineGeneticsMicrosatelliteGeneAlleleGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Aberrant Wnt pathway activation is a vital carcinogenic event in colorectal cancer (CRC). DKK1 and SFRP1 encode extracellular inhibitors of canonical and canonical/non-canonical Wnt signaling, respectively, that are frequently silenced by promoter hypermethylation in CRC. Despite their known tumor-suppressive roles, few studies have systematically examined the prognostic/predictive significance of methylation in these genes in tumor development. Using a population-based genetic epidemiological approach, we investigated the methylation status of DKK1 and SFRP1 in a large cohort of primary CRCs and correlations to patient clinicopathological data. Methods: As part of a Canadian interdisciplinary initiative to study the genetic and environmental determinants of CRC, we accrued a large number of primary colorectal carcinoma cases diagnosed in the province of Ontario, representative of a heterogeneous population (n = 558), and in the province of Newfoundland, representative of a founder population (n = 650). We examined the methylation status of DKK1 and SFRP1 gene promoters in colorectal tumors and matched normal colon tissues using MethyLight assay, a semi-quantitative methylation detection technique. We examined correlations between methylation levels and frequency, and a comprehensive array of patient clinicopathological features such as: age, sex, tumor stage, grade, tumor MSI subtype, and clinical outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed Fisher's exact test, SPSS v16. Results: Respective DKK1 and SFRP1 methylation frequencies were similar in Ontario (13%, 95%) and Newfoundland (14%, 94%). Methylation was highly tumor specific. DKK1 methylation was a strong predictor of the microsatellite instability (MSI) tumor subtype in Ontario (OR=13.7 [7.8, 24.2], p < 0.001) and in Newfoundland (OR=3.9 [2.8, 5.6] p < 0.001). SFRP1 methylation was a predictor against MSI tumors in Ontario (OR=0.25 [0.15, 0.52], p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study highlights the prognostic role of DKK1 and SFRP1 methylation related to CRC tumor subtype and suggests a novel distinction between the relative involvements of different Wnt pathways in microsatellite stable vs. unstable CRC. Citation Information: Clin Cancer Res 2010;16(7 Suppl):B28

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→