A pilot study on the determination of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other perfluorinated compounds in blood of Canadians
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pilot study was conducted to provide preliminary data on the concentrations of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA) in the blood of Canadians. A set of 56 human serum samples was collected from non-occupationally exposed Canadians and analyzed by microbore HPLC-negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. PFOS was the main component of perfluorinated organic compounds (PFCs) and was detected in all 56 blood specimens at an average concentration of 28.8 ng mL(-1) and a range from 3.7 to 65.1 ng mL(-1). The concentration of PFOA was an order of magnitude lower than that of PFOS and was found only in 16 samples (29%) at concentrations above the limit of quantification (LOQ). PFOSA was not detected at levels above the method detection limit (MDL) in any of the samples. The levels of PFCs observed in the sample group of non-occupationally exposed humans in Canada were similar to the levels reported in a previous US study with a similar sample pool size. Two distinct PFOS isomers in human serum were identified by accurate mass determination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it