MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022800508 · doi:10.4000/variations.474

L’exil du sociologue : Ernest Manheim, un migrant ordinaire

2007· article· fr· W2022800508 on OpenAlexaff
Aldo Häsler

Bibliographic record

VenueVariations · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cousin de Karl Mannheim, Ernest (Ern, Ernst) Manheim, sociologue, anthropologue et compositeur d'origine hongroise, fait partie de ces migrants que l'histoire a pousss de pays en pays, de recherche en recherche, de vie en vie. L'exil n'est pas toujours malheureux, comme en tmoigne le parcours singulier de Manheim qui de Budapest Vienne, de Vienne Kiel, de Kiel Leipzig, de Leipzig Londres, de Londres New York, de New York Chicago puis finalement de Chicago Kansas City, a adapt ses intrts de recherche chaque nouvelle tape de son priple, accomplissant une oeuvre sociologique considrable, sans toutefois trouver dans l'ancienne Europe l'cho qui lui tait d. En marge de cette tentative de reconnaissance, je me pencherai sur la figure de la distance objectivante de l'exil et sur la plasticit particulire du sociologue traversant un sicle trangement troubl. J'essaierai aussi de montrer que la fameuse thse de l' amricanisation de la sociologie qui aurait surtout frapp la France et l'Allemagne aprs 1945, doit tre relativise par le simple fait que la sociologie amricaine a d'abord t germanise ( dfaut d'tre gallicise) -et Manheim en est un exemple loquent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVariationsSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207