MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022823555 · doi:10.5380/acd.v4i1.517

O PROCESSO DE FORMAÇÃO DE EDUCADORES AMBIENTAIS: INTERPRETANDO AS DIMENSÕES POLÍTICO-EDUCACIONAIS

2003· article· pt· W2022823555 on OpenAlexaff
Marcela Buffon, J. G. CHOCIAI, G. M. C. LORENZI, Rita Gomes Rocha, Soledad Salvador, M.D.F. Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueVisão Acadêmica · 2003
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsFord Motor Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressupondo que a educação tem o papel fundamental de transformação social, quê dimensões podem ser consideradas preponderantes no processo de formação dos educadores ambientais? Amitigação dos problemas ambientais, quemarcamo início de século XXI, reforçama necessidade de seleção de valores mais dignos para toda a humanidade, capazes de construir uma nova ética, reorientadora de nossa crise civilizatória pautada em valores distintos daqueles considerados norteadores de uma sociedade de consumo e produtora de mercadoria. Assim, o desafio está em formar profissionais com motivação para escolher atividades profissionais, de ensino e de pesquisa centradas na problemática do alcance de limites da ação humana sobre o meio ambiente e qualidade de vida, ou seja, aptos a compreender a articulação das interfaces entre as diversas disciplinas e áreas do conhecimento. Neste contexto, todos devem estar inseridos no processo de pensar suas ações sobre o meio e propor alternativas para remodelar as condições e modos de vida. THE PROCESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATOR FORMATION: EXPLAINING THE POLITICEDUCATIONAL DIMENSIONS Abstract Supposing that education has a fundamental position in social transformation, what are dimensions that can be consider relevants in the formatives process to environment education teacher? Relieving environment problems that shoot XXI century’s beggining, reinforce the necessity of a value selection more dignified a new ethics that can guidance over civilizatory crisis lined in distinct values from that considered able to distinct values from that considered able to steer a society that can product and consume tinned goods. Therefore, the challenge is in formation professional with inducement to choose professional activities rather teaching as research, centre on the problem of reach the limits to human action about environment and life’s quality, directly, itmeans ability to understand interfaces joint in the various subject and areas of knowledge. In that context, everyone must be insert on the process of thinking their actions about environment and should propose alternative to shape conditions and way of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVisão AcadêmicaSame topicEnvironmental Sustainability and EducationFrench-language works237,207