Comparison of Antibody- and Cell-Mediated Immune Responses After Intramuscular Hepatitis C Immunizations of BALB/c Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current treatments for hepatitis C infection have limited efficacy, and there is no vaccine available. The goal of this study was to compare the immune response to several immunization combinations against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Six groups of mice were immunized at weeks 0, 4, and 8 with different combinations of a candidate HCV vaccine consisting of 100 microg recombinant HCV core/E1/E2 (rHCV) DNA plasmid and/or 25 microg rHCV polyprotein and 50 microL Montanide ISA- 51. Four weeks after the last injection, all groups of mice were sacrificed and blood samples and spleens were collected for measuring the levels of specific HCV antibodies (total IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a). Cell proliferation and intracellular interferon-gamma were also measured. Among the groups of immunized mice, only the mice immunized with rHCV DNA plasmid, rHCV polyprotein, and montanide (group D) and mice immunized with rHCV polyprotein and montanide (group F) demonstrated a significant increase in the total IgG titer after immunization. IgG1 was the predominant antibody detected in both groups D and F. No IgG2a was detected in any of the groups. Proliferation assays demonstrated that splenocytes from group D and group C (rHCV DNA primed/rHCV polyprotein boost) developed significant anti-HCV proliferative responses. The combination of an rHCV DNA plasmid, rHCV polyprotein, and montanide induced a high antibody titer with a predominance of IgG1 antibodies and recognized the major neutralization epitopes in HVR1. In contrast, group C did not show an increase in anti-HCV antibodies, but did show a proliferative response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".