MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022850729 · doi:10.2118/170192-ms

Contribution of Geomechanics in Evaluation of Heat Transfer Mechanisms at Mobile Zone of SAGD and ES-SAGD

2014· article· en· W2022850729 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alireza Rangriz Shokri, Behrooz Koohmareh Hosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat transferSteam-assisted gravity drainageGeomechanicsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionEnhanced oil recoveryFluid dynamicsIsobaric processViscosityCaprockMechanicsAsphaltThermodynamicsMaterials scienceGeologyOil sandsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Efficient recovery of heavy oil and bitumen in western Canada has widely been applied with thermal-based processes. The well-known Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) takes advantage of the strong dependency of bitumen viscosity on temperature ranging from 10 to 250 °C. The latent heat of injected steam is released as the steam chamber develops and causes the bitumen to mobilize and drain under the effect of gravity toward the production well. Co-injection of solvent with steam (ES-SAGD) may help to reduce the oleic phase viscosity adjacent to chamber edge by offsetting the temperature reduction effect. While many researchers are currently tackling the optimal operational conditions from a fluid property point of view (pressure, solvent fraction, etc.), less attention was paid to the impact of heat transfer due to incorporation of geomechanics into occurring physics. Such simplifications in analyzing the real processes physics would result in neglecting of the convection flow of heat along with conduction. Considering the dramatic changes in temperature at the chamber edge, the induced thermal geomechanical responses would lead to a faster fluid movement. The fluid mobility at the edge of chamber would even increase more, mainly because of temperature-dependant heat capacity of water, changes in absolute and relative permeabilities, and possible wettability alteration. If a multi-component solvent is used (ES-SAGD), the assessment of production performance would get more complicated due to the different condensation dynamics of light versus heavy components and the possible gas-blanket effect caused by the co-injected solvent. In this study, the geomechanical changes due to pressure and temperature effects were considered at the steam chamber, for both SAGD and ES-SAGD scenarios. The thermo-poro-elasticity concept, with elastic constitutive rock behaviour, was chosen for geomechanical study. The primary impacts of geomechanics on the physics of ES-SAGD were rock and fluid alterations, and changes in petrophysical properties (porosity and absolute permeability). Assuming a potential change in rock and fluid interaction due to geomechanics, the same analysis was conducted for a multi-component solvent with different condensation profiles. It was shown how the use of solvent will adversely affect the induced thermal geomechanics contribution. The findings of this paper can be used as a guideline for further experimental studies on the effect of geomechanics in thermal-based recovery processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-CanadaSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207