Renin and Prorenin Activate Pathways Implicated in Organ Damage in Human Mesangial Cells Independent of Angiotensin II Production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which an activated renin-angiotensin system (RAS) leads to the development of renal diseases, such as fibrosis, is only partially explained by the downstream effects of angiotensin II. The discovery of a receptor that binds renin and prorenin, and the consequent production of profibrotic molecules, revealed a novel axis within the RAS pathway that may contribute to the pathogenesis of organ damage in patients with elevated renin and/or prorenin levels. METHODS: To better understand the genes and networks underlying the receptor-mediated effects of renin and prorenin, a gene expression profiling study was performed on human mesangial cells in the presence of angiotensin-II-blocking agents. RESULTS: Renin and prorenin induce highly overlapping gene expression signatures that are dependent, only in part, on the presence of the (pro)renin receptor. We found that 2 distinct pathways were activated by renin and prorenin: a TGFbeta-dependent pathway and a TGFbeta-independent pathway. Bioinformatic analysis was used to show that both pathways are highly enriched with genes implicated in fibrosis, hypertrophy and atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that both renin and inactive prorenin are capable of inducing genetic programs that could contribute to end-organ damage and atherogenesis, through receptor-mediated angiotensin-independent mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".