The Periplasmic Domains of<i>Escherichia coli</i>HflKC Oligomerize through Right-Handed Coiled-Coil Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The periplasmic domains of the Escherichia coli HflK and HflC were coexpressed and purified. The two polypeptides copurified in a 1:1 ratio, as determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. Circular dichroism studies showed the complex to have substantial helical/coiled-coil content that melted with midpoints in the range of 26-29 degrees C depending upon the concentration, implying a reversible oligomerization. The average molecular weight of the soluble HflKC determined by sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation using a single-species model varied with rotor speed, providing further evidence of concentration-dependent oligomerization. The data were well-fit by models that specified a protomer to n-mer oligomerization, with the heterodimeric HflKC as the protomer and values of n between 7 and 10. Multiple-sequence alignments of both HflK and HflC revealed regions near the C termini to contain 11-residue hendecad repeats, indicative of right-handed coiled coils, with characteristic small residues in the a, f, h, and j positions. To test the importance of the small size of these positions, two residues in the HflC domain, Ala-262 in a f position and Gly-268 in an a position, were mutated to isoleucine. The HflKC:A262I mutant complex showed lower helicity than the wild type, and its melting was less concentration-dependent. During purification of HflKC:G268I, the mutated HflC subunit precipitated, leaving a preparation of the pure peripheral HflK domain. This polypeptide behaved as a monomer in sedimentation equilibrium experiments and showed low helicity, implying that the protein conformation is largely dependent upon heteromeric subunit interactions. These results demonstrate the importance of right-handed coiled-coil interactions in the oligomerization of HflKC, and a model entailing the formation of a right-handed helical barrel is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".