The ventilatory response to arousal from sleep is not fully explained by differences in CO<sub>2</sub> levels between sleep and wakefulness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Arousal from sleep is associated with transient stimulation of ventilation above normal waking levels that predisposes to subsequent breathing instability and central apnoea. The transient hyperpnoea at arousal is normally explained by differences in arterial partial pressure of CO(2) (P(a,CO2)) between sleep and wakefulness, with a higher P(a,CO2) in sleep leading to stimulation of ventilation at arousal according to the awake ventilatory response to CO(2). Surprisingly, however, the validity of this current model in fully explaining the increased ventilation at arousal from sleep has not been directly tested. 2. This study tests the hypothesis that the level of ventilation at arousal from non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep is greater than that produced by elevating P(a,CO2) in wakefulness to the sleeping level, i.e. the ventilation predicted by the current model. 3. Studies were performed in five dogs. Inspired CO(2) was used to increase end-tidal partial pressure of CO(2) (P(ET,CO2)) in wakefulness and measure the ventilatory response. The same P(ET,CO2) was then maintained in non-REM sleep. Ventilation was measured for 10 breaths before and after arousal from non-REM sleep induced by a 72 dB tone. 4. Arousal from sleep produced a transient surge in ventilation of 1.42 +/- 0.35 l min(-1) (P = 0.005). This increased ventilation was due to arousal from sleep per se as the tone alone produced no change in awake ventilation. In support of the hypothesis, ventilation at wake onset from sleep was greater by 0.83 +/- 0.28 l min(-1) (P = 0.031) than the ventilation elicited in wakefulness by raising P(ET,CO2) to the sleeping level. 5. The results show that > 50 % of the increase in ventilation at wake onset from sleep is not attributable to the awake ventilatory response to the elevated P(a,CO2) that was previously present in sleep. This result leads to important modifications of the physiological model currently used to explain the ventilatory consequences of arousal from sleep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".