MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022895635 · doi:10.1080/03014460310001599590

Relationships between visceral, trunk and whole-body adipose tissue weights by cadaver dissection

2003· article· en· W2022895635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Human Biology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrunkMedicineAdipose tissueDissection (medical)Visceral fatBody mass indexAbdomenIntra-Abdominal FatCadaverAnatomyObesityPhysiologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the important association of central adiposity and cardiovascular and other risk factors, there are only three reported values for directly weighed visceral adipose tissue (AT). All other reported values are based on medical imaging techniques. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the relationships between visceral, trunk and total AT weights in older men and women. METHODS: Data was obtained from the combination of two studies involving the complete dissection of 15 male and 16 female cadavers (age range 55-94 years) and allowed for compartmentation into skin, AT, muscle, bone and a residual component, divided over six body segments: head, trunk, legs and arms. Visceral AT was separated from trunk subcutaneous AT. All tissues were weighed. RESULTS: Visceral AT weights ranged from 0.3 to 5.8 kg. Mean values were 3.00 +/- 1.52 kg (mean +/- SE) for the men and 3.24 +/- 1.67 kg for the women. These were not significantly different (p = 0.68), but visceral AT weight, expressed as a percentage of total body AT weight was significantly greater (p = 0.02) in the men (16.8 +/- 5.4%) than in the women (12.9 +/- 3.5%). Correlations between visceral AT weight and the weight of subcutaneous AT of the trunk were highly significant (men, r = 0.70, women, r = 0.81, p < 0.005), with similar slopes for the two sexes. The correlation coefficients of visceral with total body AT weights were even greater (men, r = 0.83 and women, r = 0.96, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of older Belgians, visceral AT is strongly related to total body adiposity, corresponding to an increment of about 200 g of visceral AT for every kilogram of total AT in men and about 180 g in women. Because of this relationship, techniques such as skinfold calipers and ultrasound for assessing whole body fatness from measurement of only the subcutaneous layer are thus able to account for visceral adiposity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it