Student, soldier and senior sites: visible and ultraviolet radiation effects field study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Student, soldier, and senior sites utilize large amounts of visible optical radiation (VIS) to illuminate their premises. In housing across the United States, VIS accounts for almost one-fi fth of energy consumption. Industry recommendations encourage the use of sustainability, but site lighting compliance is lacking. Over-illuminated sites waste electricity. Unsustainable lighting may also result in light pollution and 'light trespass'. These conditions may disrupt body clocks and cause human health problems. Invisible ultraviolet (UV) radiation, a component of optical radiation, is also associated with health risks. University researchers in the current study examine artifi cial VIS and UV radiation at 10 housing sites. The researchers led undergraduate students in night-time fi eld studies to measure and document existing electric lighting. They used four tools to assess VIS, UV radiation, and sky quality in the fi eld. VIS from various electric light sources was found. Some of light levels exceeded industry standards. Student and senior housing sites utilized shortlived and low effi cacy light sources destined for landfi lls. Researchers found evidence of light pollution and light trespass. Sky quality was determined to be less than ideal. UV radiation had negligible effects. The quantifi ed environmental effects of non-sustainable lighting sources included wasted light, light pollution, and light trespass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".