Identification and Functional Characterization of CbaR, a MarR-Like Modulator of the <i>cbaABC</i> -Encoded Chlorobenzoate Catabolism Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Comamonas testosteroni BR60 (formerly Alcaligenes sp. strain BR60), catabolism of the pollutant 3-chlorobenzoate (3CBA) is initiated by enzymes encoded by cbaABC, an operon found on composite transposon Tn5271 of plasmid pBRC60. The cbaABC gene product CbaABC converts 3CBA to protocatechuate (PCA) and 5-Cl-PCA, which are then metabolized by the chromosomal PCA meta (extradiol) ring fission pathway. In this study, cbaA was found to possess a sigma(70) type promoter. O(2) uptake experiments with whole cells and expression studies with cbaA-lacZ constructs showed that cbaABC was induced by 3CBA. Benzoate, which is not a substrate of the 3CBA pathway, was a gratuitous inducer, and CbaR, a MarR family repressor coded for by a divergently transcribed gene upstream of cbaABC, could modulate induction mediated by benzoate. Purified CbaR bound specifically to two regions of the cbaA promoter (P(cbaA)); site I, a high-affinity site, is between the transcriptional start point (position +1) and the start codon of cbaA, while site II, a lower-affinity site, overlaps position +1. 3CBA at concentrations as low as 40 microM interfered with binding to P(cbaA). PCA also interfered with binding, while benzoate only weakly disrupted binding. Unexpectedly, benzoate with a hydroxyl or carboxyl at position 3 improved CbaR binding. Data are also presented that suggest that an unidentified regulator is encoded on the chromosome that induces cbaABC in response to benzoate and 3CBA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".