High Prevalence of Coxa Vara in Patients With Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical presentation of coxa vara in 283 patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The charts and X-rays of 150 girls and 133 boys with OI were reviewed. The patients were classified according to the Sillence classification modified by Glorieux: 94 type I, 90 type IV, 67 type III, 18 type V, 10 type VI, and 4 type VII. The mean age was 9.4 years (range 0.3-23.3). Twenty-nine patients (10.2%) had coxa vara (23 left and 20 right). Fifty-five percent of them were type III, 24% type IV, 13.8% type VI, and 3.4% each of types V and VII. The incidence of coxa vara was 6% in type V, 8% in type IV, 24% in type III, 25% in type VII, and 40% in type VI (P < 0.001 for difference between types I, III, and IV). The mean neck-shaft angle was 99 degrees (range 80-110 degrees), the average head-shaft angle was 104 degrees (range 90-120 degrees), and the mean Hilgenreiner-epiphyseal angle was 68 degrees (range 40-90 degrees). Twenty-five patients (36 hips) had previous femoral rodding before diagnosis and seven hips (all type III) had no history of rodding. Abduction and internal rotation of the hip joints were restricted in all patients with this deformity. All children with coxa vara had a Trendelenburg gait. In conclusion, coxa vara in OI is not rare, especially in severe forms of the disease. Regular clinical and radiologic follow-up is indicated in children with previous femoral rodding and in severely affected children, particularly those with OI type III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".