MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023014845 · doi:10.1159/000239769

Impact of Oxygen Saturation Targets and Oxygen Therapy during the Transport of Neonates with Clinically Suspected Congenital Heart Disease

2009· article· en· W2023014845 on OpenAlexaff
Sandesh Shivananda, Joel A. Kirsh, Hilary Whyte, Koshy Muthalally, Patrick J. McNamara

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoxemiaLactic acidosisAcidosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular support and intravenous prostaglandin are well established, there is a lack of consensus regarding SpO(2) targets and safety of oxygen administration during transport of neonates with suspected congenital heart disease (CHD). In many centers, an SpO(2) range of 75-85% is targeted but there is no published evidence of the clinical consequences of this approach. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of average SpO(2) range and oxygen administration during neonatal transport on clinical markers of cardiovascular instability. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on neonates with suspected CHD who presented at community hospitals. Based on average SpO(2) during transport, neonates were categorized into three distinct groups: group I (SpO(2) <75%), group II (SpO(2) 75-85%), group III (SpO(2) >85%). The severity and proportion of neonates with hypoxemia, metabolic and lactic acidosis on arrival at level III NICU were compared. A comparison was also made between oxygen requirement and indicators of cardiorespiratory instability. RESULTS: Seventy-five neonates were studied and 14 (19%), 38 (50%) and 23 (31%) neonates were allocated to groups I, II and III, respectively. Therapeutic interventions during the transport stabilization process included oxygen (n = 53, 71%), mechanical ventilation (n = 56, 75%) and prostaglandin E1 (n = 63, 84%). The severity or proportion of neonates with hypoxemia, elevated lactate or metabolic acidosis was similar between the groups. Neonates receiving an oxygen requirement of FiO(2) >70% had lower arterial SpO(2) on arrival. A provisional diagnosis of CHD and/or PPHN (p = 0.01) and neonates receiving inotropes (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for cardiovascular instability. CONCLUSION: If congenital heart disease is strongly suspected oxygen should be cautiously weaned to maintain a minimum SpO(2) >75%. Neonates receiving >70% oxygen are at greatest risk of metabolic acidosis or critical hypoxemia and may benefit from expedited transfer to a cardiac center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207