MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maternal Hemodynamics After Oxytocin Bolus Compared With Infusion in the Third Stage of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2005· article· en· W2023063533 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory Davies, Julie L. Tessier, Mary C. Woodman, Adrienne Lipson, Philip M. Hahn

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBolus (digestion)AnesthesiaOxytocinHeart rateConfidence intervalMean arterial pressureBlood pressureHemodynamicsSalineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of oxytocin bolus or infusion on maternal hemodynamics in the third stage of labor. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy fashion, 99 women received an intravenous oxytocin bolus (10 IU push) and 102 women received an infusion (10 IU in 500 mL saline at 125 mL/h) at delivery of the anterior shoulder. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were measured every minute for 10 minutes, then every 5 minutes for the next 20 minutes. These serial measurements were analyzed using a 2-factor analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Serial mean arterial pressure measures varied significantly between groups (interaction effect, P = .002). Mean arterial pressure (+/- standard deviation) nadirs were reached after 10 minutes, 80.9 (+/- 11.0) mm Hg in the bolus group compared with 77.0 (+/- 12.1) mm Hg in the dilute infusion group. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 4.0 (0.7-7.2) mm Hg. Serial heart rate measures also varied between groups (interaction effect, P < .001). Mean heart rate (+/- standard deviation) peaked 1 minute after the oxytocin infusion, 115 (+/- 27) beats per minute (bpm) in the bolus group compared with 109 (+/- 21) bpm in the dilute infusion group. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 6.6 bpm (-0.1 to 13.3). The dilute oxytocin infusion group experienced a greater mean estimated blood loss (423.7 mL compared with 358.1 mL, P = .029, t test), increased use of additional oxytocics (35.3% compared with 22.2%, P = .044, Fisher exact test) and a greater drop in hemoglobin (admission minus postpartum) (17.4g/L compared with 11.4g/L, P = .002, t test) compared with the oxytocin bolus group. CONCLUSION: Bolus oxytocin of 10 IU is not associated with adverse hemodynamic responses and can safely be administered to women with intravenous access in the third stage of labor for postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207