Maternal Hemodynamics After Oxytocin Bolus Compared With Infusion in the Third Stage of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of oxytocin bolus or infusion on maternal hemodynamics in the third stage of labor. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy fashion, 99 women received an intravenous oxytocin bolus (10 IU push) and 102 women received an infusion (10 IU in 500 mL saline at 125 mL/h) at delivery of the anterior shoulder. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were measured every minute for 10 minutes, then every 5 minutes for the next 20 minutes. These serial measurements were analyzed using a 2-factor analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Serial mean arterial pressure measures varied significantly between groups (interaction effect, P = .002). Mean arterial pressure (+/- standard deviation) nadirs were reached after 10 minutes, 80.9 (+/- 11.0) mm Hg in the bolus group compared with 77.0 (+/- 12.1) mm Hg in the dilute infusion group. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 4.0 (0.7-7.2) mm Hg. Serial heart rate measures also varied between groups (interaction effect, P < .001). Mean heart rate (+/- standard deviation) peaked 1 minute after the oxytocin infusion, 115 (+/- 27) beats per minute (bpm) in the bolus group compared with 109 (+/- 21) bpm in the dilute infusion group. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 6.6 bpm (-0.1 to 13.3). The dilute oxytocin infusion group experienced a greater mean estimated blood loss (423.7 mL compared with 358.1 mL, P = .029, t test), increased use of additional oxytocics (35.3% compared with 22.2%, P = .044, Fisher exact test) and a greater drop in hemoglobin (admission minus postpartum) (17.4g/L compared with 11.4g/L, P = .002, t test) compared with the oxytocin bolus group. CONCLUSION: Bolus oxytocin of 10 IU is not associated with adverse hemodynamic responses and can safely be administered to women with intravenous access in the third stage of labor for postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".