MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023123202 · doi:10.1002/dvg.22040

A conditional allele of <i>Rspo3</i> reveals redundant function of R‐spondins during mouse limb development

2012· article· en· W2023123202 on OpenAlexafffund
Stanley J. Neufeld, Jessica M. Rosin, Anshula Ambasta, Kristen Hui, Venessa Shaneman, Ray Crowder, Lori Vickerman, John Cobb

Bibliographic record

Venuegenesis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyAlleleCre recombinaseExonGeneLimb developmentWnt signaling pathwayEmbryonic stem cellFunction (biology)GeneticsTransgeneGenetically modified mouse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R-spondins are secreted ligands that bind cell surface receptors and activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Human mutations and gene inactivation studies in mice have revealed a role for these four proteins (RSPO1-4) in diverse developmental processes ranging from sex determination to limb development. Among the genes coding for R-spondins, only inactivation of Rspo3 shows early embryonic lethality (E10.5 in mice). Therefore, a conditional allele of this gene is necessary to understand the function of R-spondins throughout murine development. To address this need, we have produced an allele in which loxP sites flank exons 2-4 of Rspo3, allowing tissue-specific deletion of these exons in the presence of Cre recombinase. We used these mice to investigate the role of Rspo3 during limb development and found that limbs ultimately developed normally in the absence of Rspo3 function. However, severe hindlimb truncations resulted when Rspo3 and Rspo2 mutations were combined, demonstrating redundant function of these genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuegenesisSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207