Thermodynamic, Kinetic, and Electron Microscopy Studies of Concanavalin A and Dioclea grandiflora Lectin Cross-linked with Synthetic Divalent Carbohydrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The jack bean lectin concanavalin A (ConA) and the Dioclea grandiflora lectin (DGL) are highly homologous Man/Glc-specific members of the Diocleinae subtribe. Both lectins bind, cross-link, and precipitate with carbohydrates possessing multiple terminal nonreducing Man residues. The present study investigates the binding and cross-linking interactions of ConA and DGL with a series of synthetic divalent carbohydrates that possess spacer groups with increasing flexibility and length between terminal alpha-mannopyranoside residues. Isothermal titration microcalorimetry was used to determine the thermodynamics of binding of the two lectins to the divalent analogs, and kinetic light scattering and electron microscopy studies were used to characterize the cross-linking interactions of the lectins with the carbohydrates. The results demonstrated that divalent analogs with flexible spacer groups between the two terminal Man residues possess higher affinities for the two lectins as compared with those with inflexible spacer groups. Furthermore, despite their high degree of homology, ConA and DGL exhibit differences in their kinetics of cross-linking and precipitation with the divalent analogs. Electron microscopy shows the loss of organized cross-linked lattices of the two lectins with analogs possessing increased distance between the terminal Man residues. The loss of lattice patterns with the analogs is distinct for each lectin. These results have important implications for the interactions of lectins with multivalent carbohydrate receptors in biological systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".