MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adenomyosis: US Features with Histologic Correlation in an in Vitro Study

2000· article· en· W2023164644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenomyosisMedicineEchogenicityRadiologyMyometriumKappaPredictive valueUltrasoundPredictive value of testsGynecologyPathologyEndometriosisUterusInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) features of adenomyosis by correlating them with histologic findings and to assess inter- and intraobserver agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US was performed and videotaped in 102 consecutive hysterectomy specimens in a water bath. Videotapes were reviewed initially by two independent radiologists blinded to the clinical and histologic findings and after 1 month by one of the two; US and histologic findings were correlated. Features evaluated included diffuse abnormal echotexture of myometrium, subendometrial myometrial cysts, subendometrial echogenic nodules, subendometrial echogenic linear striations, nodular endometrial-myometrial junction, poor definition of the endometrial-myometrial junction, asymmetric thickness of the anteroposterior wall of the myometrium, and globular configuration. RESULTS: The prevalence of adenomyosis in this cohort was 29.4% (30 of 102 specimens). The mean sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis for the three reviews were 81%, 71%, 90%, 54%, and 74%, respectively. All findings evaluated, except for nodular endometrial-myometrial junction, were significantly more common in uteri with adenomyosis (P <.05). Heterogeneous myometrium reached borderline significance (P =.05). The specificities and PPVs of subendometrial striations, subendometrial echogenic nodules, and asymmetric myometrial thickness were significantly higher than those of other features (P <.05). The interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.48), and the intraobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0. 67) for the three reviews. CONCLUSION: The presence of subendometrial linear striations, subendometrial echogenic nodules, or asymmetric myometrial thickness improves the specificity and PPV of US in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it