MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023182288 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2253770

On MMSE Vector-Perturbation Precoding for MIMO Broadcast Channels With Per-Antenna-Group Power Constraints

2013· article· en· W2023182288 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmood Mazrouei‐Sebdani, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingMIMOMathematicsMean squared errorControl theory (sociology)Norm (philosophy)Minimum mean square errorZero-forcing precodingAlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceCombinatoricsStatisticsBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, studies on suboptimal precoding techniques for multiple-input multiple-output broadcast channels (MIMO-BC), which achieve performance near to that of the dirty paper coding (DPC), have drawn attention to vector perturbation (VP) precoding. In practice, each antenna or more generally each antenna group has its own limit on the transmitted power, which makes per-antenna-group power constraints more meaningful than the sum power constraint. In this paper, we introduce an optimization technique for VP precoding employing the minimum mean-square error (MMSE) criterion with per-antenna-group power constraints. This technique is inspired by the p-sphere encoding in a sense that it involves finding the node with the lowest mean-square error (MSE) over a lattice. We demonstrate that the MSE metric, as well as the p-norm one, can be enclosed in a proper Frobenius-norm ball. This Frobenius-norm ball shrinks until it captures the perturbing vector minimizing the MSE. Numerical results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms conventional VP precoding and the p-sphere encoding, but at higher complexity. Consequently, we investigate a couple of simplified techniques employing the MMSE criterion, which perform almost as well as the proposed precoding technique, but are less complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207