MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023204707 · doi:10.1002/gcc.20790

AP2 transcription factor induces apoptosis in retinoblastoma cells

2010· article· en· W2023204707 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaodong Li, Darryl Glubrecht, Roseline Godbout

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Chromosomes and Cancer · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetinoblastomaRetinoblastoma proteinBiologyTranscription factorGeneTumor suppressor geneTransfectionCancer researchE2F1Transcription (linguistics)ChromosomeGeneticsCell biologyCell cycleCarcinogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The underlying cause of human retinoblastoma is complete inactivation of both copies of the RB1 gene. Other chromosome abnormalities, with the most common being extra copies of chromosome arm 6p, are also observed in retinoblastoma. The RB protein has previously been shown to interact with TFAP2 transcription factors. Here, we show that TFAP2A and TFAP2B, which map to chromosome arm 6p, are expressed in the amacrine and horizontal cells of human retina. TFAP2A RNA can readily be detected in retinoblastoma cell lines and tumors; however, the great majority of retinoblastoma cell lines and tumors are completely devoid of TFAP2A protein and TFAP2B RNA/protein. Transfection of TFAP2A and TFAP2B expression constructs into retinoblastoma cells induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation. Our results suggest that a consequence of loss of RB1 gene function in retinoblastoma cells is inactivation of TFAP2A and TFAP2B function. We propose that inability to differentiate along the amacrine/horizontal cell lineages may underlie retinoblastoma tumor formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Chromosomes and CancerSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207