The onset and evolution of a spring bloom on the Scotian Shelf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spring bloom on the Scotian Shelf is examined using a mooring array deployed from 18 March 2002 to 18 April 2002 to provide physical, chemical, and biological measurements with high temporal and vertical resolution. These measurements are complemented by the Atlantic Zone Monitoring Program (AZMP) biweekly occupations of a station near the mooring site (HL2). Results from AZMP sampling and Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor (SeaWiFS) ocean color imagery in early March show that coastal upwelling played an important role in the initiation of the spring bloom near the coast. This was a period of very strong horizontal gradients in surface chlorophyll. The main bloom at HL2 was sustained for most of the mooring period with peak chlorophyll levels reaching 6 mg m‐3. Following the drawdown of nutrients in the upper 20 m, the bloom continued for 9 d and then disappeared at the surface but remained at the depth of the nutricline (30‐50 m). The onset and evolution of the spring bloom on the inner Scotian Shelf is a complex process in which nutrient inventory, vertical mixing, and coastal upwelling play roles of varying importance throughout its lifetime. Mesozooplankton biomass does not change significantly until the very end of the mooring period indicating the grazing by this component of the zooplankton did not have as important a role in the termination of the bloom as the exhaustion of near‐surface nutrients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".