MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023227990 · doi:10.1080/17546559.2015.1019911

“You will receive so many stab wounds here”: the role of the cathedral chapter in the 1331 Girona Holy Week riot

2015· article· en· W2023227990 on OpenAlex
Caroline Smith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medieval Iberian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThursdayContext (archaeology)HistoryHonorAncient historyJudaismPower (physics)CeremonyNarrativeLawArtArchaeologyTheologyPolitical scienceLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Holy Week violence was a familiar phenomenon in various towns throughout the Crown of Aragon and elsewhere in Southern Europe. Ritualized forms of aggression and confrontation allowed Christians to reaffirm the inferiority of Judaism and the triumphant superiority of Christianity. This article examines the Holy Week riot in Girona in 1331, which was not only a clash between Christians and Jews but a competition for power within the city between the cathedral community and the lay royal officials posted in Girona. As men of uniformly noble backgrounds, the cathedral canons maintained ties to their families and the world of honor and violent competition for status. Their connection to the military aristocratic lineages of the diocese informed their reaction when confronted by the lay royal officials in Girona on Holy Thursday 1331, leading them to respond with threats, bravado, and violence to defend the honor of the chapter and wider cathedral community. Two cathedral canons and their squires, servants, and other clerics threw rocks at the royal officials, brandished unsheathed swords and knives, and threatened their opponents, alternately retreating into the cathedral and pursuing their opponents throughout the cathedral district. This article explores the reaction of the two participant canons and the rest of the cathedral chapter during and after the events of Holy Thursday 1331, investigating the local context in which these events occurred. In response to a subsequent royal inquiry into the events of the riot, the chapter brought their own lawsuit against the royal officials, reframing the narrative to shift blame on to the royal officials and the Jews themselves. This paper argues that members of the cathedral chapter reacted and reframed the events of Holy Thursday 1331 as an attack by the royal officials on the power and position of the cathedral community within the city and reacted accordingly in defense, using aggressive, violent threats, tools familiar to them as members of the diocesan nobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it