MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2023272798 · doi:10.1177/1715163513482713

Hypertension: Silent and/or ignored / L’hypertension silencieuse ou ignorée

2013· article· fr· W2023272798 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ross T. Tsuyuki, Norm R.C. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureDiseaseIntensive care medicineGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ignore this editorial. Hypertension is so banal—it’s really common, easily measured and assessed, the treatment is mostly pharmacologic. . . . Wait a minute! That should be very exciting for pharmacists. Consider these facts: Hypertension is the number 1 leading risk factor for death and disability globally.1 Infectious diseases, poor sanitation and HIV are important, too, but 13% of all deaths (9.4 million annually) and 7% of all disability are caused by increased blood pressure. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared its World Health Day 2013 theme to be hypertension.2 Indeed, in terms of “doing the most good for the most people,” as a pharmacist, focusing on hypertension might be the most important thing you can do. As you know, when blood pressure increases above 115/70 mmHg, blood vessels are damaged, causing more than half of all strokes and cases of heart disease, as well as being a major risk factor for kidney failure, dementia and other vascular diseases.3 World Health Day in 2013 plans to focus attention on the causes and consequences of hypertension, the need for people to adopt healthy behaviours to prevent hypertension, the need for regular blood pressure checks and the need for governments to create healthy environments to assist in preventing hypertension.2 Canada is well advanced in efforts to prevent and control hypertension compared with many countries. About 1 in 5 adult Canadians have hypertension, while the rate in many countries is over 3 in 10. Canada also has the highest national rate of treatment and control of hypertension,4,5 possibly because it has had strong nongovernmental and governmental partnerships, an extensive interdisciplinary hypertension education program (CHEP) and a well-organized hypertension community, led by Hypertension Canada (www.hypertension.ca).6 Canada also has a recently updated Pan-Canadian Framework to help guide the effort to prevent and control hypertension.7 Further, a national committee of health care and scientific organizations (the Canadian Hypertension Advisory Committee), including the Canadian Pharmacists Association, is helping guide and prioritize actions for prevention and control of hypertension. Look for the updated hypertension guidelines for pharmacists in the next issue of CPJ. By the numbers: #1: Hypertension is the number 1 risk for death and disability around the globe. 1/5 of Canadians have hypertension. 90% of Canadians living an average life span will develop hypertension. 1/3 of Canadians with hypertension are not controlled. 44% of people with diabetes have poor hypertension control. Although much has been accomplished, far too many Canadians remain adversely affected by increased blood pressure. It is estimated that over 90% of Canadians living an average life span will develop hypertension and that close to 7.5 million adult Canadians have hypertension.8,9 Many Canadians are particularly vulnerable, including ethnic minorities and people with low incomes and education. Close to 1 in 3 Canadians have uncontrolled hypertension10 (as do 44% of people with diabetes)11 and lack of awareness of hypertension is common in young adults.10 Cardiovascular risk factors other than blood pressure are largely not well controlled in people with hypertension. And, because much of hypertension is caused by unhealthy diets, the Canadian Hypertension Advisory Committee is focused on advocating for the implementation of healthy food policies7 (see https://www.facebook.com/HypertensionTalk?ref=stream).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada→Same topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies→French-language works237,207→