MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023283803 · doi:10.1139/v09-136

A kinetic study of dimethyl sulfoxide reductase based on density functional theory

2010· article· en· W2023283803 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Elizabeth Hernández‐Marín, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryAdductReaction mechanismSubstrate (aquarium)Gibbs free energyDimethyl sulfoxideComputational chemistryStereochemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a density functional theory study on the oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reaction of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with model complexes resembling a functional synthetic analogue of the molybdoenzyme DMSO reductase. The good agreement between our calculated Gibbs free energy profile and data derived from experimental kinetic parameters supports the reaction mechanisms of the oxygen atom transfer proposed in this study. When the mechanism involves the formation of a DMSO-bound intermediate, the calculations on the free energy surface provide valuable information that explains the origin of the apparent contradiction between the experimental findings and previous theoretical calculations with respect to the rate-limiting step of the reaction mechanism. The enzymatic mechanism of the OAT reaction is more complex than the mechanism of any synthetic analogue, mainly due to the formation of an enzyme-substrate adduct prior to the appearance of the substrate-bound intermediate. This study also presents a possible mechanism for the formation of such an adduct and the subsequent oxygen atom transfer. The mechanism involves a proton transfer to and from the substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207