Examining a canine model of stunned myocardium with Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has previously been shown that the distribution volume of Gd-DTPA (lambda) in infarcted, canine myocardium is higher than that of normal tissue. The purpose of this study was to determine whether stunned myocardium exhibits increased lambda. Stunning was produced in beagles by means of 30 min LAD occlusion followed by 3 weeks (n = 4) reperfusion. Gd-DTPA was infused at each imaging session and lambda determined in vivo using a saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence; cine imaging was used to assess ventricular wall thickening (%WT). (201)Tl uptake was used as an independent assessment of viability. %WT data confirmed that the brief insult caused prolonged, yet reversible, regional contractile dysfunction in each animal. %WT was not significantly different from baseline values by 3 weeks post-reflow. Normal (201)Tl uptake confirmed the absence of infarction. The lambda of stunned tissue (lambda = 0.381 +/- 0.030 ml/g) was not elevated above that of normal tissue (lambda = 0.398 +/- 0.027 ml/g, P = NS), at any time point studied, in vivo. These data suggest that an increase in lambda is a specific indicator of irreversible damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".