MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023327254 · doi:10.1121/1.1377870

Broadband parametric imaging of breaking ocean waves

2001· article· en· W2023327254 on OpenAlexaff
Rex K. Andrew, David M. Farmer, R.L. Kirlin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaNorth Pacific Marine Science Organization
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsBubbleAcousticsFetchWavelengthWind speedBreaking waveGeologyWakeOpticsWind waveFrequency bandPhysicsSurface waveMeteorologyWave propagationMechanicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An acoustic array was deployed in the near-surface layer of a fetch-limited coastal inlet to image breaking waves using only the sound radiated in the band (400 Hz to 2000 Hz) from the breaking region. The breakers were assumed to possess predominantly spiller characteristics. For this frequency band, the wavelength of sound in bubble-free water is much larger than the surface wave height and the depth of the breaker bubble plume, so both were considered insignificant. The 15-element array was configured as a sparse horizontal cross with an 8 m aperture, bottom moored, and positioned nominally 3 m beneath the surface. Propagation from the source to the array elements assumed dipole sources, an acoustically flat surface, and an acoustically thin bubble plume. The radiating region was parameterized by a broadband two-dimensional Gaussian profile: information from up to six independent frequencies was combined to yield a maximum-likelihood image. Analysis shows that the images align closely with the wind and can be observed moving downwind with a speed roughly equal to 70% of the phase speed of the dominant wind waves. A model of acoustic source strength which is linear in log frequency is found fit the data reasonably well, and model parameters are provided for a single wind speed. Unlike other imaging experiments, this technique provides measurements of the size and shape of the bubble-creation region at or near the peak of the radiated autospectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207