MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023347240 · doi:10.1021/pr7006363

Tandem Immunoprecipitation of Phosphotyrosine-Mass Spectrometry (TIPY-MS) Indicates C19ORF19 Becomes Tyrosine-Phosphorylated and Associated with Activated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

2008· article· en· W2023347240 on OpenAlexaff
Jiefei Tong, Paul Taylor, Eleonora Jovceva, Jonathan St‐Germain, Lily L. Jin, Ana Nikolić, Xiaoping Gu, Zhihua Li, Suzanne Trudel, Michael F. Moran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunoprecipitationEpidermal growth factor receptorPhosphorylationChemistryTandem mass spectrometryTyrosine kinaseEpidermal growth factorTyrosineSignal transductionReceptor tyrosine kinaseReceptorMolecular biologyBiochemistryMass spectrometryBiologyCancer researchGeneChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To identify phosphotyrosine (pY) sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) network, a tandem immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry method (TIPY-MS) was applied wherein protease-digested EGFR immune complexes were extracted with anti-pY after Rush et al. ( Nat. Biotech. 2005, 23, 94 ) and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. New pY sites in the pathway were found, including SOS1 Y1065, SOS2 Y1275, CBL-B Y889, and in the EGFR regulatory protein Mig-6 Y458. The novel human C19orf19 gene product was found EGFR-associated and phosphorylated at 5 tyrosines in response to EGFR activation and, therefore, represents a new component of the EGFR signaling network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207